How to start a NIS 2 implementation program

Start with scope and context, then establish governance and an implementation plan. Build an initial baseline across assets, risks, and current controls to prioritize work.

Starting a NIS 2 implementation program is a scoping and governance exercise before it becomes a control deployment exercise. The first step is to define the organization’s context: sector, services, critical processes, dependencies, and the systems that support them. This context shapes what must be protected, what disruptions matter most, and which stakeholders must be involved.With context defined, you establish scope. Scope should be defensible and practical: which entities, sites, systems, and services are included, and which interfaces must be managed. A weak scope creates blind spots, while an overextended scope makes delivery unrealistic. Scope decisions should be documented because they become audit and assurance reference points.The next step is governance. Assign accountability for the program, clarify decision authority for risk acceptance and control prioritization, and define how progress and issues will be reported to management. Governance is not bureaucracy; it is the mechanism that prevents implementation from becoming a set of disconnected actions.Once governance is set, build a baseline. Analyze current policies, controls, incident handling processes, and continuity arrangements. Combine this with asset identification and risk analysis to prioritize gaps. This baseline leads to an implementation roadmap: workstreams, deliverables, owners, evidence expectations, and a testing and monitoring plan.A strong start ends with an executable plan and a shared operating model: common terminology, documented roles, and a consistent method for mapping NIS 2 requirements to controls and evidence. This foundation reduces rework later and accelerates measurable progress.

Related Information

  • Context analysis determines what must be protected and why.
  • Scope must cover key dependencies and interfaces, not only systems.
  • Governance defines who decides, who delivers, and how progress is reviewed.
  • A baseline combines current controls with asset and risk analysis.
  • A roadmap should include testing, monitoring, and evidence requirements.

Expert Insight

Teams often begin by listing controls, but without a baseline and prioritization model they struggle to make decisions. The fastest route is to map assets and critical services first, then connect risks to control improvements and to incident readiness. This creates a defensible rationale for sequencing.Another practical point is evidence design. Decide early what proof you will keep: policies, configurations, training records, test results, incident tickets, metrics. If you build evidence as you go, you avoid expensive consolidation later and you can show progress with confidence.

If scope and governance are unclear, the program will drift and evidence will be weak.

Expert Trainer

Expert Trainer

Topics

NIS 2implementationscopegovernanceroadmapasset managementrisk

We use cookies to improve your experience

Necessary cookies are always active. You can accept, reject non-essential cookies, or customize your preferences.