It should produce traceable evidence that controls were implemented and tested, findings were managed, and monitoring supports ongoing assurance.
A verification process is valuable when it produces artifacts that can be reviewed and repeated. Evidence typically includes defined verification criteria, test outputs, reviews of security practices, and documented findings with ownership and status.
To support continual improvement, verification evidence should connect to remediation and follow-up, and it should integrate with monitoring so organizations can detect regressions or new risks introduced by changes.
Teams often run scans but don't link results to decision-making. The most useful evidence ties findings to risk, ownership, remediation timelines, and re-verification.
“Verification evidence turns security into something you can manage.”
Expert Trainer
Expert Trainer
ASCs are applied by translating security requirements into lifecycle controls that are planned, implemented, verified, monitored, and improved as applications evolve.
Incident management connects by using incidents to validate controls, improve detection and response, and drive corrective actions in the application security program.
It requires demonstrable evidence that required practices are implemented and operating, aligned with the assessment methodology and expectations.
Necessary cookies are always active. You can accept, reject non-essential cookies, or customize your preferences.